<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Republicans Lose Party Identification in Texas</title>
	<link>http://lubbockleft.com/2009/01/30/republicans-lose-party-identification-in-texas/</link>
	<description>A strong progressive voice in Lubbock, TX</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 18:45:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://lubbockleft.com/2009/01/30/republicans-lose-party-identification-in-texas/#comment-9595</link>
		<author>John</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 14:47:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://lubbockleft.com/2009/01/30/republicans-lose-party-identification-in-texas/#comment-9595</guid>
		<description>One of the things that strikes me about this trend is that while it's true that voters who identify themselves as Republicans have decreased by 11.4%, the graph shows an increase in voters who identify themselves as Democrats of only 3.8%.  The real story here is that the number of respondents who identify themselves with neither the Republicans nor the Democrats has almost doubled, from 8% in 2002 to 15.6% in 2008.

How many of those do you think are actually just conservatives that don't want to be associated with Bush?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the things that strikes me about this trend is that while it&#8217;s true that voters who identify themselves as Republicans have decreased by 11.4%, the graph shows an increase in voters who identify themselves as Democrats of only 3.8%.  The real story here is that the number of respondents who identify themselves with neither the Republicans nor the Democrats has almost doubled, from 8% in 2002 to 15.6% in 2008.</p>
<p>How many of those do you think are actually just conservatives that don&#8217;t want to be associated with Bush?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

